I’m an avid participant in our democratic system.  I also feel strongly that those who don’t vote should shut the hell up about how government operates.  Your failure to participate in it negates your privilege to complain about it.

I am constantly disappointed in voter turnout.  Sure, there are plenty of folks I believe should be prohibited from voting.  That would include ill-informed people who do such things as voting along party lines simply because that’s much easier than learning about the individual candidates and issues, then voting conscience instead of partisanship.

Given these two facts, what are my thoughts on compulsory voting?  I think it’s a terrible idea.

Richard makes several important points supporting the premise of forced democracy.  Despite the seeming logic, however, the taste of the phrase rolling from my tongue is cause for nausea.  The draft is marginally tolerable in defense of the country.  To institute such a policy to force citizens to vote is in no way comparable to that premise.

Voters are allowed to abstain from any race.  Not voting in an election is the equivalent of abstaining from all races on the ballot.  He suggests allowing blank ballots to compensate for this right.  Perhaps I missed the point of making people go to the polls.  I agree that getting bodies to voting locations would increase participation; equally, I understand that many would abstain from the race by way of the blank ballot, thereby accomplishing little in the way of forcing their participation.

Democracy is a voluntary system, not a compulsory one.  Attempting to force anyone to vote in any race is indeed a violation of personal freedom despite his claim that “the imposition of voting is very small compared to the social benefits noted…”  You may recognize that as synonymous with “the ends justify the means.”  In the same manner — and significantly more important to the general welfare — let us also implement compulsory charitable donations.  Even better, the government should simply remove said donations from our income much like taxes.  “In the interest of the greater good” moves us significantly toward that place we are desperately trying to avoid at present: a police state.

The idea of paternalistic compulsion and its related concerns is an excellent philosophical debate.  That said, however, I do not believe his rendition of the argument provides sufficient material to rebut.  We certainly do not believe our government to be trustworthy; assuming so to countervail the issue does an injustice to his point.

I cannot negate the pro arguments he makes.  Dramatically increasing voter participation would serve many purposes, not the least of which would be to ensure a more informed electorate and a government truly chosen by the majority of a country’s denizens — not just a majority of voters.  Unequal representation is often a direct result of low voter turnout as he mentions.  There are other positive aspects that he points out as well as some beyond the scope of his post.

None of these things warrant compulsory voting.  Doing a thing because you want to is vastly different from doing a thing because you have to.  In addition, being forced to do a thing is by no means a guarantee that said thing will be done properly or with any serious consideration.  Some forced to the polls may well serve their own interests by random or arbitrary voting.  I would much prefer that not happen as it does not serve the greater good and can work against the people’s interests.

Like Richard, I’d be interested in knowing what you think about the idea.

Please accept with no obligation, implied or implicit, our best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low stress, non-addictive, gender neutral celebration of the winter solstice holiday, practiced within the most enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion of your choice, or secular practices of your choice, with respect for the religious/secular persuasions and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions at all…

…and a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling, and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted calendar year 2006, but not without due respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have helped make America great, (not to imply that America is necessarily greater than any other country or is the only “AMERICA” in the western hemisphere), and without regard to the race, creed, color, age, physical ability, religious faith, choice of computer platform, or sexual orientation of the wish.

(By accepting this greeting, you are accepting these terms: This greeting is subject to clarification or withdrawal. It is freely transferable with no alteration to the original greeting. It implies no promise by the wisher to actually implement any of the wishes for her/himself or others, and is void where prohibited by law, and is revocable at the sole discretion of the wisher. This wish is warranted to perform as expected within the usual application of good tidings for a period of one year, or until the issuance of a subsequent holiday greeting, whichever comes first, and warranty is limited to replacement of this wish or issuance of a new wish at the sole discretion of the wisher.)

[via Wayne]

The fact that man knows right from wrong proves his intellectual superiority to other creatures; but the fact that he can do wrong proves his moral inferiority to any creature that cannot.

— Mark Twain

On genuine teaching being not the transfer of information by rote but instead the nurture of learning…

No man can reveal to you aught but that which already lies half asleep in the dawning of your knowledge.
…
If he is indeed wise he does not bid you enter the house of his wisdom, but rather leads you to the threshold of your own mind.
The astronomer may speak to you of his understanding of space, but he cannot give you his understanding.
The musician may sing to you of the rhythm which is in all space, but he cannot give you the ear which arrests the rhythm nor the voice that echoes it.
…
For the vision of one man lends not its wings to another man.