Photinia photos
Posted on Jan 8, 2007 by jason
I was playing with the camera (as I’m wont to do, right?) and snapped some photos of the Fraser photinia bushes (a.k.a. red-tip photinia, Photinia x fraseri) surrounding my patio. Some of them turned out better than I expected, so I thought I’d share them with you.
Now you see why photography will never be my career—not if I want to make money, that is.
I especially like the last one because the sunlight shining through the leaf brings out all the details.
Tags: Fraser photinia bush
Permalink Trackback
9 Responses to “Photinia photos”
Leave a Reply






- All posts
- All photos
- All videos
- Past Members:
Previous Entries
Recent Comments
- AJ: Um…IR 17;m sorry, but I’m not going to allow this, young man. Your...
- Jessie: Jason! Thanks so much for these pictures and explaination. I had an up close...
- Marie Sansone: Very sorry to read this. Your photos, writing, and insights will be...
- Alex Wild: Wait, what? You’re leaving us? Say it ain’t so! We’ll miss...
- Clive Hicks-Jenkins: What you’ve achieved here has changed things for the better....
- Lark: Hey Jason, I will miss your awesomeness. Best of luck.
- Nate: In the relatively short time I’ve been following you (still it’s an...
- Marvin: Best of luck no matter what your final decision, but “sabbati cal”...
- Joy K.: I’m heartbroken to hear that xenogere may be ending its run, so soon...
- Mary: Jason, you made me cry. I am sharing similar feelings and have been wondering,...
Categories
Photos
Videos
Blogroll
- Bad Astronomy
- Bankside
- Beetles in the Bush
- Bill of the Birds
- Bird Ecology Study Group
- Birder's Lounge
- Bug Eric
- Built on Facts
- catsynth
- Clive Hicks-Jenkins' Artlog
- Count your chicken! We're taking over!
- Coyote Crossing
- Dark Roasted Blend
- DDolan: New Birder
- Deep Sea News
- Dolittle's Domain
- FallToClimb
- Fraser’s Birding Blog
- From the Faraway, Nearby
- How To Write Badly Well
- Information Is Beautiful
- J R's Birds
- Jew Eat Yet?
- JournOwl
- Living Alongside Wildlife
- Mary's View
- Modulator
- Murrmurrs
- Myrmecos
- NASA JPL
- nathalie with an h
- Nature in the Ozarks
- Nature Woman
- Not Exactly Rocket Science
- Photo Synthesis
- Pixel This
- Search and Serendipity
- Somewhere in NJ
- Starts with a Bang
- Strange Observations
- SwampThings
- The Clade
- The annotated budak
- The Birder's Report
- The Dragonfly Woman
- The Drinking Bird
- The Intersection
- The Little House in the Not-So-Big Woods
- The Loom
- the Marvelous in Nature
- Thoughts from Kansas
- Uncertain Principles
- Up Close with Nature
- Via Negativa
- Walk the Wilderness
- Weedon’s World of Nature
- Whatever
- Wild About Nature Blog
- Yips and Howls
Fine Print
Best viewed with anything other than Microsoft's Internet Exploder.
All logos and trademarks found within this site are the property of their respective owners.
Comments are the property of their respective posters.
Times are shown in UTC.
Use of this site is governed by my Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
See my Disclosure Policy for information on advertising here.
Copyright © 2002-2010 Jason M Hogle at xenogere. All Rights Reserved.





























xocobra
Jan 08, 2007
you’ve been inside entirely to long.
Just kidding. I can do that with my mom’s camera but i then have to wait for the film to develop. i’m apparently digital camera challenged.
jason
Jan 08, 2007
Well, I have this thing for nature and do my best to capture some of it for my own enjoyment. Maybe I have been inside too long . . .
Amazingly, I’m just always surprised by the quality of some of what I shoot considering I don’t have a high-dollar, high-quality, professional camera. It’s a rinky-dink Canon that doesn’t have powerful lens capabilities, true macro zoom, or even the bestest doodads or gadgets or gizmos that can be found on SLR/dSLR cameras. Still, it constantly amazes me with what it can capture when used correctly (something I’ve only recently begun doing after reading TFM!).
All that said, it still won’t hook up to my telescope or capture really good photos from a distance, so ultimately I’ll need to replace it sooner rather than later if I want to enjoy the kinds of photographs I’m interested in taking.
xocobra
Jan 08, 2007
wasn’t knocking it at all. it does take some great shots for what capabilities that camera has. great purchase, to bad it isn’t made for your ‘scope, that would be cool to see. Jason’s version of “Cosmos”
jason
Jan 08, 2007
Oh, I didn’t take it as an insult or anything. But they could be better. I’ll admit that. You’d be amazed at the vast quantity of no-posted photos I take. There are literally thousands.
Once I figured out most of the major functions, however, I got much better at taking shots. Or at least utilizing its capabilities.
And yes, once I get one compatible with the telescope, I’ll know I’ve hit the big time. That takes 35mm compatibility. That’s a significant step above what I have now, and it’ll offer all sorts of opportunities for good—dare I say great?—photography in the future, and not just when hooked up to the telescope.
All in due time . . .
xocobra
Jan 09, 2007
you could even incorporate pictures into your books. makes those of us with lesser intelligence to enjoy it easier
jason
Jan 09, 2007
I’ve thought about doing some kind of photo books. Most likely, I’d go that route if/when I write one about the cats. But I could dabble in other areas if so inclined and able. We’ll see how it all works out.
xocobra
Jan 09, 2007
when you do buy the camera, you could always do a kids version of cosmos. Hell, i might be able to understand it at that point.
jason
Jan 09, 2007
Kitty Cosmos . . . Your feline guide to the universe.
I like it!
xocobra
Jan 09, 2007
i was thinking of the human kind of kid but, that would be an interesting read to see what a cat’s universe consists of. what they see, what “stars” they gaze at. hmmm, that would be a good children’s book