Part 2 – Stay tuned for Part Four

That is an unacceptable answer. The Constitution and FISA-related laws clearly define the legal requirements of such an act. National security is a poor excuse in this case when using wholesale and [unwarranted] governmental monitoring of Americans’ activities.

You failed to read or adhere to the first e-mail. Let me reiterate: disclosing such information is a violation of AT&T’s and SBC’s policies and agreements with it customers. It is a violation of the US Constitution. It is a violation of federal law.

Qwest said “no” to these requests and the blatant invasion of privacy inherent in such a disclosure. There was and is no legal requirement for such blatant betrayal of your customers; the lack of action against Qwest proves this.

Again, have you disclosed this information to the federal government without warrant, judicial or congressional oversight, disclosure to customers, legal precedent, constitutional support, and lawful confirmation? There are only two answers to the question: “yes” or “no”.

– [jason]